Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
From The Times December 11, 2007 Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless Michael Evans, Defence Editor A helicopter-carrying merchant ship that sank with the loss of 12 men after being hit by...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Sorry senior, but your views are factually incorrect. I was involved in the process of helping grown ups decide if Harry was to go and know from personal experience that he was desperately keen to get...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
happy for harry's sake that he wanted to serve with his comrades. Based on past experiences with you Jim, I am taking you at your word on this. If the man is to be even the figure head of a valued...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Senior - check your PM's - incoming!
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Alexius55 wrote: CliffS- one slight factual error. At the time of the Falklands, Andrew was technically second in line to the throne- Harry is third. However, as Diana was pregnant with Willia...Read...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Shame one or two of these weren't available. Read More
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Just picked up on this bit of thread and as someone who was there would like to give my view on the situation.The reason the Conveyer was with 'us' at the time of her sinking was purely to bring us...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Thanks very much for the first hand account, hermes. I always enjoy your posts. You and your mates had my full, riveted attention when I was supposed to have been studying for my A levels!
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
I would think that since Atlantic Conveyor was carrying military materiel, her "civilian" status was academic anyway; she was a bona fide target for the Argentines. And I would suggest that the very...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
OSCSSW wrote:happy for harry's sake that he wanted to serve with his comrades. Based on past experiences with you Jim, I am taking you at your word on this. If the man is...Read More
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Hi deep thanx for the phots, . The second pic was roughly the view I caught as you steamed past us, I just managed to pop my head out on deck to cheer you guys on yu way home. Always remember looking...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Yep get down there Deep have you been back since -82- ,are you aware of the indulgence scheme for SAMA members.
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Must agree with IcelofAngeln's comment that the presence of tooled-up Harriers and Chinooks on board classified Atlantic Conveyor as "armed" when she was hit. That's not the point, though: the debate...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
That's not the point, though: the debate is over why she wasn't better equipped with self-protection measures against the perceived threat of ASMs.Well, it is to the point in the sense that, claims...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
OSCSSW wrote:Prince Andy's SH3 Ron was also used as decoys. I assume they had ECM with "Blip Enhancement" (we called it "Meconing"). Basically the ECM gear rturns an "enhanced" radar signal that...
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
double post. Who knew my mouse finger was so fast???
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Rmor wrote: OSCSSW wrote: Prince Andy's SH3 Ron was also used as decoys. I assume they had ECM with "Blip Enhancement" (we called it "Mecon...Read More
View ArticleRe: Legal fears left Atlantic Conveyor defenceless
Rmor wrote: Deepsixteen wrote: Read More
View Article
